What Paramount and Netflix’s Turmoil Reveals About Competition Law
Paramaount’s standoff with Netflix as they attempt a billion dollar acqusition highlights the growing risks in the streaming sector around competition law.
Koffels appear in all Australian jurisdictions handling litigation of contentious matters, including court actions, arbitration, mediation and other forms of dispute resolution. We have litigation experience in a wide range of courts from State Tribunals to the High Court of Australia. In addition, the firm maintains relationships with experienced barristers who are able to conduct advocacy in any jurisdiction of the State or in any Federal Court as required.
We are well aware of our client’s need for their legal representation to be cost-effective and are mindful of viable alternatives to litigation wherever possible. We understand the importance of commercial resolution and we try our best to provide both creative and pragmatic approach in response to each of the clients’ unique circumstances.
The area of work includes:
We are also able to assist clients in cross-border litigation for both commercial and criminal litigation. We have the global capability and specialise in arranging overseas legal representation for clients in Australia who has litigation of contentious matter overseas. We use our membership with Lawyers Associated Worldwide (LAW) and IR Global to connect our clients to over 1000 firms in 150 different legal jurisdictions. We can also assist in locating suitable experts for the client’s cross-border litigation.
Paramaount’s standoff with Netflix as they attempt a billion dollar acqusition highlights the growing risks in the streaming sector around competition law.
The Victorian government is seeking to overturn the High Court’s decision in Bird v DP which held that instituions cannot be held vicariously liable for individuals who are not technically employees.
For decades, non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) have been quietly used by institutions to prevent survivors of sexual abuse from speaking out. While NDAs can serve legitimate purposes they have also been weaponised to conceal patterns of misconduct. While other jurisdictions have now moved to ban or restrict NDAs relating to sexual misconduct Australia still has no clear national framework. As more survivors seek justice through civil claims, the law must confront an urgent question – should NDAs be allowed to silence victims of child abuse?
Survivors of the Parramatta Marist High School Canoe Club have taken action over historical abuse by teacher Graeme Stuart Hawkins. This article outlines the court findings, institutional failures, and our ongoing work to help additional Survivors come forward confidentially.